Home » credibility

Obama Speaks to Muslims

I think that President Barack Obama did a great job in Cairo. He reached out without bending over.

Visit for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

From Political Animal:  In his speech in Cairo this morning, President Obama early on established some credibility and goodwill with his audience. He talked about the sources of tension between the United States and Muslims around the world, heralded the culture and contributions made by Muslims throughout history, quoted the Koran, cited the burgeoning Muslim communities in the U.S., and explained his belief that he has a “responsibility” to “fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

But what arguably mattered most about the speech was the president using that credibility and goodwill to challenge Muslims and the Middle East to do more.

A rejection of anti-American attitudes:

“Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known.”

A rejection of 9/11 conspiracy theories:

“I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.”

Support for Israel:

“Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed — more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction — or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews — is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve…. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state; to recognize Israel’s legitimacy; and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.”

Rejection of violence:

“Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America’s founding. This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It’s a story with a simple truth: that violence is a dead end. It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered.”

Promoting democracy:

“[T]here are some who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. No matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who hold power: you must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.”

Religious liberty:

“Among some Muslims, there is a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of another’s. The richness of religious diversity must be upheld” whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt. And fault lines must be closed among Muslims as well, as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq. Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it.”

The rights of women:

“Our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons, and our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity “men and women” to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice.”

These weren’t rebukes or condemnations, they were a president issuing a challenge, and forging a new basis for an international relationship. It was also a reminder that Obama, no matter where he is, doesn’t talk down to his audiences, or shy away from nuance or complex ideas.

By |2009-06-04T13:10:30-04:00June 4th, 2009|Obama administration, Religion|4 Comments

Penn this right here

If someone in your campaign has done something terribly wrong, then you fire that person. Not kind of fire him/her. Is Mark Penn that good? Can you upset unions? Can you appear like a hypocrite since you talk about apposing the Colombian Free Trade Agreement on one hand and have a top adviser sucking up to the Colombians on the other hand?

Hillary Clinton is between a rock and a hard place. Fire Penn and retain credibility.

By |2008-04-07T23:29:55-04:00April 7th, 2008|Countdown, Domestic Issues, Election 2008|Comments Off on Penn this right here

John Bolton has no Credibility

The Vice President, Dick Cheney, is back in Iraq. It is completely unclear to me why he would be back in Iraq. As far as I know, during his tenure in the Bush administration, he’s been unable to negotiate with anyone except for other neocons in Congress.

Ten months ago, Cheney was in Baghdad. This is four months into the “surge.” He was there to “jumpstart” negotiations between Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds. I guess that since he did such an excellent job last time, President Bush thought he was the man for the job again this time. John Bolton, former State Department neocon and (Senate-unapproved) United Nations ambassador, said Cheney has “enormous credibility there, and is able to say to them in words of one syllable that they need to get their act together.”

John Bolton is almost laughable in his continued neocon rhetoric. Why do reporters continue to report what he says? He, like Cheney, have been wrong about almost everything. I understand why reporters continue to report what Vice President Cheney says — he’s the Vice President. John Bolton, on the other hand, is not in the government anymore (thank God).

Do you like the way John Bolton demeaned the Iraqis as if they don’t know what’s at stake? I believe the Iraqis understand exactly what’s at stake. The problem is, some Iraqis believe they have more to gain by fighting than with negotiations.

By |2008-03-18T09:45:22-04:00March 18th, 2008|Bush Administration, Iraq|1 Comment
Go to Top