Thank you, Senator Barack Obama. Even though you stated the obvious, it needed to be said again. Obama directly responded to Senator John McCain and his ridiculous charges from yesterday. McCain knows that he will lose on the issues, so he plays these games.
From JohnMcCain.com:
With less than three months to go before the election, a lot of people are still trying to square Senator Obama’s varying positions on the surge in Iraq. First, he opposed the surge and confidently predicted that it would fail. Then he tried to prevent funding for the troops who carried out the surge. Not content to merely predict failure in Iraq, my opponent tried to legislate failure. This was back when supporting America’s efforts in Iraq entailed serious political risk. It was a clarifying moment. It was a moment when political self-interest and the national interest parted ways. For my part, with so much in the balance, it was an easy call. As I said at the time, I would rather lose an election than lose a war.
Thanks to the courage and sacrifice of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines and to brave Iraqi fighters the surge has succeeded. And yet Senator Obama still cannot quite bring himself to admit his own failure in judgment. Nor has he been willing to heed the guidance of General Petraeus, or to listen to our troops on the ground when they say — as they have said to me on my trips to Iraq: “Let us win, just let us win.” Instead, Senator Obama commits the greater error of insisting that even in hindsight, he would oppose the surge. Even in retrospect, he would choose the path of retreat and failure for America over the path of success and victory. In short, both candidates in this election pledge to end this war and bring our troops home. The great difference is that I intend to win it first.
Obama finally states that we all love America. We may have different views on how to get America back on her feet but we all love America. (See video below.)
I feel I have to say something about McCain’s constant talk about the Surge. McCain acts as if a great military strategy has been carried out when, it fact, more has happened beyond what the U.S. did. The Sunni leaders decided to kick Al Qaeda out of their country. We helped, but it was their idea. It has been called the “Awakening.” This started before our Surge. Without the cooperation of Sunni tribal leaders we would still be in deep doo-doo. Yes, the Surge worked to control violence in Baghdad but it has also separated neighborhoods. As we barricaded off Sunnis and Shittes, we caused people to be forced out of their homes.
This is not mentioned by McCain at all. McCain would never mention that a group of Sunni leaders that supported the Awakening were recently blown up. The picture that John McCain paints– that America has kicked ass and taken names under the great leadership of General David Petraeus– is overly simplistic and only partially true.
What happens when we quit paying them not to confront us? I wish he would ask McCain to explain win. The only reason we have a time “Horizon” is because they have started to demand we leave. So now it is called a victory because they refuse to sign an extended stay plan. Pretty much slapped Bush in his face.
Yeah, but … Republicans win American elections on “overly simplistic and and only partially true.” The new Georgia mess raised the foreign-policy stakes and partially freed McCain from the old Iraq mess, letting him smear and talk tough without defending Bush’s screwups. Enough Hamlet, already–Obama has to start scrapping now or suffer the consequences. Here’s the latest from Reuters/Zogby:
Reuters/Zogby Poll: McCain Makes a Move, Takes 5-Point Lead Over Obama
Obama loses ground among Dems, women, Catholics & even younger voters
UTICA, New York – As Russian tanks rolled into the Republic of Georgia and the presidential candidates met over the weekend in the first joint issues forum of the fall campaign, the latest polling includes drama almost as compelling – Republican John McCain has taken a five-point lead over Democrat Barack Obama in the race for President, the latest Reuters/Zogby telephone survey shows.
McCain leads Obama by a 46% to 41% margin.
And McCain not only enjoys a five-point edge in a two-way race against Obama, but also in a four-way contest including liberal independent candidate Ralph Nader and Libertarian Bob Barr, the poll reveals. In the four-way contest, McCain wins 44% support, Obama 39%, Barr 3% and Nader 2%.
This latest Reuters/Zogby poll is a dramatic reversal from the identical survey taken last month – in the July 9-13 Reuters/Zogby survey, Obama led McCain, 47% to 40%. In the four-way race last month, Obama held a 10-point lead over McCain.
It is easier for McCain to threaten Russia than to deal with our country and our issues. I think the people are wanting to talk about something else and this gave McCain an edge. I see anger in everyday people about the economy and want to lash out. So here comes Russia trying to defend what “THEY” think is right. Just like Bush is doing in Iraq. What does McCain do but pick fight. He scares the bejezzees out of me. He will be so quick to bomb anyone before he thinks. What I wish people would think about there are alot of new boudaries coming up. China wants Taiwan to bend to them. McCain just is looking to address anything that is something other than dealing with our own problems,
What is interesting is the military had relief supplies there faster than we were able to get our people off roofs in New Orleans.
Jeff-
Dems has a whole were slow to figure out what was up in Georgia. You are 100% correct. McCain painted a black and white picture. The fact that the Georgia president called out McCain on national news seems to have gotten by most Americans. The fact that McCain has a paid Georgian lobbyist on his staff doesn’t seem to matter or it hasn’t been stressed enough for Americans to become outraged.
Thanks for your comments.
M –
McCain is great at bluster but isn’t so good at putting in the time and the effort to figure out a situation.
thanks for your comments.
@ margaret… You really just equated Russia’s invasion of Georgia with the U.S. invasion of Iraq??? You’re kidding me, right?
If you are so outraged at Bush in Iraq… why are you not SIMILARILY outraged at Putin???–whos acts are even supposedly MORE unilateral, power-driven, and motivated by OIL??? That would be a good start in developing an even mildly objective view of the world… but you don’t. You look at Putin’s actions… and then blame Bush or at least excuse those actions because Bush somehow caused or laid the groundwork for them.
You are right though… there ARE alot of boundary disputes “coming up”… and the question YOU need to ask is how should those disputes be settled? In favor of totalitarian states or free states??? Which side will you take? and does Obama have a great track record of standing up to totalitarian regimes? I don’t see a track record… and that should worry you.
Joel –
You have to admit that there is a lot of similarities between our invasion of Iraq and Russia’s invasion of Georgia. We didn’t like Saddam. Russia doesn’t like the president of Georgia.
I’m not worried about Barack Obama standing up for what is right. He has a long history of that. As you recall, Bush has no experience in foreign policy yet, you were comfortable with him. So, Barack Obama, who has far more knowledge about foreign policy than Bush did/does, should make you plenty comfortable.
Finally, Obama will appoint knowledgeable people to important posts and not political knuckleheads. Obama will keep us safe and restore our standing in the world.
I see McCain as a person who reacts instead of thinking. Why else would he have made the comments Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Picking a fight.
I never said what Putin did was right… But what I have read about Georgia their president had been picking the fight with Russia. Putin isn’t stupid. He thought about his timing. McCain doesn’t think we need to have someone with a level head on their shoulders. Mc Cain seems to have something to prove… Look who is advising McCain on this issue a paid Georgian lobbyist.
Now Bush has pressed the issue and infuriated Putin even more with the missile defense system in Poland. Yes I am so glad we have started another cold war.
If Bush had agreed to allow Russia in on helping out with the missle defense. Do you think they would be as mad at us now. They are predicting that Cuba is going to get dragged into this also.
First, I think that claiming both are similar because both countries were invaded by an outside force is kinda simplistic… (we could equate all wars and all military actions this way… which doesn’t really get anyone anywhere in a discussion). Georgia wasn’t ethnically cleansing these people… it was (at least arguably) reacting to Russia’s meddling in provinces which it had no business in… and Georgia wasn’t in violation of 16-odd UN resolutions… I don’t think I need to re-visit the DISASTER that was Saddam’s Iraq to convince you that this is OBJECTIVELY a bad parallel.
This being said, The only solutions I have ever heard Obama give for the evasion of armed conflict is Diplomacy and the UN — both have been proven failures at this very objective! Saddam repeatedly spat in the face of “soft power” as has Putin by invading another UN member without so much as a security counsil meeting! At least McCain’s smart enough to figure out that Putin doesn’t care about negotiations!
I’m kinda concerned about our standing in the world too… and who is calling out to America to rescue them? Georgians… and does our standing with Georgians go up or down when we are powerless to remove russians from their cities?
Is our standing the world going to go UP or DOWN when we start abandoning our democratic friends in Europe to Russian imerialism???? I tend to think that when we abandon our principles… when we turn a blind eye to the Kremlin’s activities… when we acquiesce to the authoritarian desires of Putin and his cronies… to Saddam and his cronies… to Kim Jong ill… for “peace”… (i.e. for our own temporary “security” at the expense of the lives of the people living under those regimes)… our “standing” CERTAINLY goes down in the eyes of the people to whom I think it matters most.