Possible Criminal Investigation of BP

Posted on: May 29th, 2010 by ecthompson md No Comments

President Barack Obama is in the Gulf. Many progressives want more to be done. My question is what? What more can and should Obama be doing? I can't think of anything. Neither he nor the federal government have expertise in oil spills (it doesn't seem that BP has expertise either, but that's another story). Just think of what's on Obama's plate. Granny Doc has more:

Barack Obama has been elected to be President of the United States.  Among the issue on his plate, today, are the attack on two mosques in Lahore, Pakistan.  The standoff between North and South Korea, a situation so serious that China felt the need to try and calm the situation down.  The continuing melt down in the Euro Zone, with terrific potential to bring the economy crashing back to bottom.

The ongoing crisis in Haiti.  The intrusion of Brazil and Turkey into the nuclear issues surrounding Iran.  The current blockade of 9 large relief ship headed to Gaza, by Israel.  Two wars.  And, they're STILL rioting in Africa!

If we profess to live in a Global World, a world in which every issue must be treated as effecting us, compromising our security, or effecting our economic well being, is it reasonable to expect the President to push everything else aside, concentrating only on the Bright Shiny Object that has our immediate attention? (more...)

Obama from the coast:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Looks like the Justice Department is looking into a criminal investigation of BP.

Reporting from Washington A team of top federal prosecutors and investigators has taken the first steps toward a formal criminal investigation into oil giant BP's actions before and after the drilling rig disaster off Louisiana.

The investigators, who have been quietly gathering evidence in Louisiana over the last three weeks, are focusing on whether BP skirted federal safety regulations and misled the U.S. government by saying it could quickly clean up an environmental accident.

The team has met with U.S. attorneys and state officials in the Gulf Coast region and has sent letters to executives of BP and Transocean Ltd., the drilling rig owner, warning them against destroying documents or other internal records.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Dr Thompson wrote:"it is hard to see a double standard"Not hard to see it from here.I have no doubt that if a Republican had uttered the vile racist comments that Bill Maher considers 'humorous', that you would've reacted in quite a different way.

Dr Thompson wrote:"he (BIll Maher) is a comedian. some times he is funny. other times he isn't"If he were a conservative and made those comments, your response would've been far different than a shrug of the shoulders 'sometimes he's funny, sometimes he's not'.Why the double standard?

Give me an example of a conservative comedian that I have treated differently. Without an example, it is hard to see a double standard.

[quote]Many progressives want more to be done. My question is what? What more can and should Obama be doing? I can’t think of anything[/quote]Dr Thompson - I would be remiss if I failed to mention my excitement in "re-finding" your blog. My friend Field-Negro has you listed as his "Blogs That I Am Feeling" links.I used to read your propaganda years ago and the other day I wondered if you had changed your tune now that your friends are running the key institutions of the nation.I wonder if it is possible that "you can't think of anything" more that what Obama can do because of your ideological myopia?There are 3 elements to this oil spill:1) The oil spewing from the well2) The oil that is in the Gulf3) The protection of the shore from contaminationWhile there is no doubt that BP and the Industry are the actors to address #1 near exclusively, it is #2 and #3 where your myopia shows.At this point "any entity with a boat" can do more. I realize that certain operatives sit back and say "So now conservatives want big government involvement?". This is preposterous. BP is going to eventually get invoiced for all of this mess. It is now a matter of who has the maritime resources to assist.The federal government, knowing that the oil was headed ashore should have been far more responsive in protecting the shores. President Obama offered to "study" the proposal for sand berms being built to protect fragile nesting grounds. Does he believe that SAND is more destructive to the environment than is oil?Unlike most I am NOT attempting to "attack Barack Obama" for political purposes. Let's not pretend, however, that what Obama puts forth as "intelligent deliberation" (as compared to Bush's "shoot from the hip") is actually an inability to make rapid decisions. Absent an "attack media" forcing his hand this particular weakness in Obama is not exposed.

Thanks for your comment.I was wondering what exactly is your solution. Since more than 50% of the oil isn't on the surface, exactly what is a boat going to do?

According to Bill Maher, the problem is that Obama isn't 'acting black'.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/...Thank God for liberals like Bill Maher.

he is a comedian. some times he is funny. other times he isn't.

One thing Obama could do is stop BP from dumping toxic dispersant in the Gulf along with all of that oil.